Saturday, May 17th, 2008

Lessons & Observations from the Festival Circuit - PART 2

I go to Sundance and Toronto every year, (this was my 13th Sundance and this year’s Toronto will be my 9th), and I usually cover the local LA festivals pretty extensively:  LAFF, AFI Fest, Silver Lake Film Festival, Dances With Films, etc.  But other than being invited to attend or being asked to participate on a jury, I don’t generally stray to many smaller regional festivals.  So it was an interesting experience to visit several this year with my film “True Love” and assess how they were doing and see what they were programming.  Several observations have already been noted in PART 1--there are a bunch of specialty studio arms putting their films in these little festivals now, the press and audiences are flocking to those films (and their celebrities) first, some locally-made films garner press attention and audiences, (surely those who contributed to the project are there), and the overall quality of lesser-known films is higher than it was a few years ago.  Something else I’m seeing is the star-directed film, where a famous, or at least relatively well-known actor directs a film and invites their star friends to be involved.  There were several out on the trail this year:  “Battle in Seattle” (directed by Stuart Townsend), “Then She Found Me” (directed by Helen Hunt), “The Cake Eaters” (directed by Mary Stuart Masterson), and an interesting little film called “Karl Rove, I Love You,” directed by an often-seen, if not well-known character actor named Dan Butler, (you may remember him as “Bull” on TV’s “Frasier").  Here are some of the films I caught over the last few months that are worth checking out, by festival: 

* Method Fest - carving out a unique niche as a festival that focuses on the actor, Method Fest featured a number of performance-based films that I enjoyed.  The quintessential film for this kind of festival may be “Choose Conner,” written and directed by Luke Eberl.  It wasn’t hard to see why this film didn’t make it into Sundance--quite frankly, it was pretty horribly shot and directed.  What was so amazing about it was how much the good writing and good performances managed to save the day.  I wouldn’t normally denigrate a film here (if I don’t like something, I just don’t talk about it), but I think it’s useful to once again point out how important good performances are to any film, especially ones made at the lowest budget levels.  “Choose Conner” is ultimately a very good film.  The story is told with honesty and subtlety, and the performances are across-the-board terrific, especially the young Alex Linz and the always dependable (but lately very slimy--in a good way) Steven Weber. 

Another interesting film, the first of my faux/moc docs to speak of, is “Fix” directed by Tao Ruspoli.  The film uses the conceit of two documentary filmmakers who have to take a family member to a rehab facility, and film the whole event with their cameras--everything you see is from that camera’s perspective.  If you’re like me and you’ve seen this kind of thing in one form or another ad nauseum, then you probably get a little queasy just thinking about having to sit through another one.  Well, the good news is that “Fix” transcends it’s somewhat limited conceit is several interesting ways.  The filmmakers have made a very dynamic piece that doesn’t get trapped by its own strict rules; and it doesn’t break those rules either, which is another pet peeve of mine.  The perfs are strong and the camera work, by DP Chris Gallo, is excellent.  If you have any doubts about the Panasonic HVX-200, see this film. 

* Atlanta Film Festival - another faux doc, “The Project,” which like “Fix” premiered at Slamdance, (if SXSW is the place where mumblecore films get programmed, Slamdance is the place faux docs get programmed); Sundance isn’t really programming either of these kinds of films anymore, (with a couple of exceptions).  Director Ryan Piotrowicz is a talented filmmaker who has done a wonderful job here.  There’s never a false note, in a film where false notes could be easily rendered, and the actors do a terrific job.  A fake documentary about filmmakers who get too involved in their own film, this is the kind of film that would have played Sundance 10 years ago, but now seems a little “done.” Doesn’t take away from the fact that it is extremely well-"done".

Alex Karpovsky’s mock doc “Woodpecker” was also incredibly well-done.  One of those fake docs that’s so realistic and so subtle that you never really know if it’s fake or not, “Woodpecker’s” strength lies in the film’s central performance from Jon Hyrns, and in Karpovsky’s confident direction.  Perhaps a bit slow for most people’s tastes, Karpovsky never lets the conceit get away from him, which is often the downfall of the phony documentary. 

* WorldFest-Houston - amazingly, this is the third oldest film festival in the U.S.  And you ask, why haven’t I heard more about it?  Well, that’s a topic for another time.  Interestingly, the number of film festivals across the country has exploded in just the last 15 years, going from two-digits to four-digits in that time.  Don’t believe me, just check the editions of the next festivals you apply to; most will be in their 5th year, or 10th year, but few will be in their 20th year.  SXSW is in their 15 year; Tribeca is in their 8th year; AFI Dallas is only in their 2nd year. Back to WorldFest:  “Before The Rains” is the kind of film I will often skip at a festival--big, expensive period piece not being distributed by a major company.  Usually these films, well, suck.  But this popular festival film, while not necessarily David Lean-like, was certainly well worth watching.  Set in the Kerala region of India, the cinematography and landscape captured was just stunning.  And the story, about a British imperialist who has an affair with a native Indian woman just before India’s independence, had a bit of bite to it.  This film is getting a limited release around the country by Roadside Attractions.

* Indianapolis International Film Festival - not to be confused with the “other” Indianapolis festival--Heartland--IIFF programs the real festival films:  the tough artfilm; the depressing, but honest drama; and OK, also “Young @ Heart,” (who didn’t program it this year? These young festivals have to find ways to be around next year).  One day I saw a trilogy of downbeat dramas back-to-back-to-back that will never get (substantive) releases, but will please hardcore art film fans nonetheless.  And isn’t that the point of a film festival? To program high quality films that we can’t normally see at our multiplex, or even on cable?  Well, that used to be the priority.  It still is at IIFF. 

JJ Lask’s “On The Road With Judas” is an extremely unique film, one of those mind twisters. I missed maybe the first 30 seconds of it, but thought I’d missed more and had no idea what the fuck was going on.  Turns out, you’re really not supposed to know what’s going on until the end.  Very funny and interesting film with a strong ensemble cast.

Another little-seen Sundance feature at IIFF was “Chronic Town,” director Tom Hines drama about the kinds of lost souls who wash up in Alaska, which featured a strong performance from lead JR Bourne.  This was one third of my downbeat trilogy, which also included “Take” starring Minnie Driver as a mother who loses her son in a grocery store hold-up, and “This Beautiful City,” director Ed Gass-Donnelly’s ubiquitous hyperlink drama about troubled upper- and lower-class souls in Toronto.

Joachim Trier’s “Reprise” was a bold feature debut that will be opening soon in the States and is well worth seeing for its unique and energetic visual style and narrative structure.  “May the Best Man Win” was a somewhat slight, but mostly funny mock-doc about the competition between old friends vying to be their best buddy’s Best Man. Adam Fleischhacker’s film features many faces familiar to fans of Comedy Central and SNL.

There’s nothing like attending three or four festivals in a row to teach you what kinds of films to be making and what kinds to be avoiding.  If you don’t have a star in your film and it can’t be described in a provocative way in 1-2 sentences, good luck getting anybody in the theater.  If you don’t have an interesting production still for your key art, forget it.  If your film doesn’t have an obvious audience, or it’s not an “issue” doc, or a horror film, or a comedy, or a horror/comedy, then you’ve got an uphill battle ahead of you.  I’m not saying you should make a horror/comedy, I’m saying keep these points in mind when you start preparing your festival film.  Then be unique, be bold.

1 Comments:

1. Great article, well written. Thank you, this will surely help.

   Posted by NoBudgetFilmSchool  on  05/29  at  10:17 AM