
- Best election piece I’ve ever seen
October 23, 2008 - DEAR ZACHARY-a new must see documentary!
October 17, 2008 - FilmRadar Field Trip “Silents Under the Stars” w/Louise Brooks & Historic Tour
August 6, 2008 - Trailer for THE BROTHERS BLOOM
August 5, 2008


- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- September 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- March 2006
- November 2005
- August 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
OSCAR-The Anti Climax
I was talking with my friend Mike on the phone yesterday about it and he said, “I’m not sure if Helen Mirren will win now, everyone has “Mirren fatigue.” I responded, “That’s not HER fault.” The problem with the Oscars is that there are SO MANY awards leading up to it that Oscar night itself feels very anti-climatic. It feels like opening all of the presents on Christmas morning when you know exactly what is in each box. There is no element of surprise. There are a truckload of critics awards, the Golden Globes, Broadcast Critics, SAG awards and so on. This year (as with many years) the same exact people have won every award. I don’t hold that against them at all. I’m sure their work is deserving, but it just makes for a dull Oscar night. Why are these other shows really necessary? It just all seems to be way too much overkill in my humble opinion. What if there were NO awards before the big night? There would be a much greater air of suspence. There would be no playbook or set of assumptions to work from. The results would be fresh and wouldn’t just feel like a repeat of every award show leading up to it. The stakes would be much higher....or at least it would feel that way to me. As evidenced by today’s NY Times article, I may not be the only one out there who feels this way.
Post the First Comment!







