
- Ripley’s Believe It Or Not (1930-32) - The Complete Vitaphone Shorts Collection
March 17, 2010 - TOE TO TOE
March 14, 2010 - True/False Redux
March 9, 2010 - THE ART OF THE STEAL
March 5, 2010


- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- January 2005
Surveillance: Lies R US!
Let’s say you are a Fed hot on the trail of a pair of killers and interviewing the only surviving witnesses. The hitch is two of the witnesses are lying to you to cover their own crimes.
That’s the premise of, “SURVEILLANCE;” a new messed up thriller by Jennifer Lynch.
Two FBI agents (Bill Pullman and Julia Ormond) are called to rural B.F.E. to investigate a series of grisly murders. The only witnesses are Jack Bennet (Kent Harper) who lost his partner (a fantastic turn by French Stewart) in the carnage. Also, there is Bobbi (Pell James), a coke whore and a traumatized eight year old girl (Ryan Sympkins) who lost her whole family. The three start relating their versions of their experiences. The cokehead claims to have been out on a job interview (really a drug deal), the cop had been investigating tourists with flat tires (that he shot out for fun to harass the drivers). The only real lead they have is the young girl who can only accurately communicate in crayola images. The three met on the highway through a series of coincidences. The agents unravel the stories one by one leading to one of the most shocking conclusions in recent memory.
The first act is a dry, cliché ridden set up. However, the second and third go into overdrive, charged with intensity. This is a VERY dark rural town we have discovered, one where no one is truly innocent. While it does have a few gallons of blood thrown in for good measure, the genius moments are in the lead up to this violence. Without trying to spoil too much, the two bored cops enjoy tormenting passing tourists. This is taken to an extreme and while there is no blood, one can’t help but feeling their innerds being twisted. Considering the history of cops abusing their power, this puts you right into the middle of it. The result is an intense, skincrawling episode that is enough to tempt you into running up the aisle.
Performances are top notch, with the haunting Harper and Stewart leading the pack. Stewart, usually cast as the clown, shows some real chops and you may be seeing him frequently as the heavy from now on. Even the normally vanilla Pullman ignites during the climax to show a range uncommon in his previous roles.
Check out “Surveillance” this weekend, it is a strong alternative to Summer Blockbuster fare. Oh, and Transformers sucks.
2 Comments:
Everyone has an “expectation of privacy” if it is your own residence you can have surveillance cameras guarding your residence anywhere that you yourself can watch. When a visitor comes to your home their only expectation of privacy is in your bathroom, shower, etc. Think of the cameras as an extension of your eyes. You wouldn’t peep in your bathroom (at least I hope you wouldn’t) if someone was visiting. Anywhere you would like to watch otherwise (on your property) is fair game. Nobody has an expectation of privacy in your garage or your backyard. As long as one party knows they are being monitored (in this case you and your family or people who live at your residene) then any of your recordings is legitimate and can serve as evidence.
Posted by Surveillance on 08/12 at 12:53 PMI think there is way too much surveillance already, I’d prefer to get our freedom back and take the risk. Any cell phone can be legally tapped without a warrant now as well as all pc’s. Yet the most important defensive measures like the borders and inspections of incoming container ships are skipped.
SurveillancePosted by Surveillance on 08/12 at 12:56 PM







